Search
Close this search box.

Rwanda to buy Uganda’s drugs

clip
President Kagame examining drugs at Quality Chemicals in Kampala

By Conan Businge

President Paul Kagame has pledged that his Rwandan Governemnt will soon start buying some of its antiretroviral and anti-malarial drugs from Quality Chemicals in Uganda.

President Kagame made the pledge on his visit to Quality Chemicals factory in Kampala city’s suburb, Luzira, yesterday morning.

Quality Chemical’s chief executive officer, Emmanuel Katongole, in his brief to the press after the inspection of the factory on Friday, said President Kagame’s pledge will start with purchases for the public sector.

“We will also be selling to the private sector, on top of the public sector,” Katongole added. Katongole promised President Kagame drugs which meet the international standards.

“We shall offer you first-world quality of drugs, at third-world prices. Our prices are not the lowest, but are comparable to those recommended by World Health Organisation.” Quality Chemicals has already registered its products in Rwanda, and have a pre-qualification by WHO.

President Kagame also promised to work with Uganda, to locally process anti-malarial drugs’ raw materials- ‘Artemisia annua.’ Artemisia annua is the source of artemisinin, an antimalarial compound recommended by the World Health Organisation. Widely cultivated in China and Asia, Artemisia is a new crop for Africa and is largely limited to Kenya, Tanzania and Uganda.

Today, the harvested plants in Uganda are exported for processing in India, after which Quality Chemicals, like other pharmaceutical companies, buys it as a raw material to produce antimalarial drugs.

“With Rwanda opening up its market for our products, it will greatly resonate Quality Chemicals in the rest of Africa and spur more investments in the rest of Africa,” Katongole said.

Katongole added that Quality Chemicals is also considering investing in Rwanda.

Quality Chemical Industries is a state-of-the-art pharmaceutical manufacturing plant located in Kampala, Uganda.

It exists as an additional contract manufacturing site for CIPLA Ltd, which manufactures and sells combination therapy antiretroviral and antimalarial drugs that have proven to be most effective in combating HIV/AIDS and Malaria.

Source: New Vision

http://www.newvision.co.ug/news/628633-rwanda-to-buy-uganda-s-drugs.html

East African Community: Are we running fast yet standing still?

Presidents L-R; Museveni, Kagame, Kikwete,Kibaki and Nkurunziza after the adoption and signing of EAC Customs Union in Arusha in 2009.

By Sheila Naturinda

The just concluded East African Community summit in the Burundian capital Bujumbura, has revealed that the political leadership is more optimistic about the process than its citizens.

The summit also reveals that there is a lot of political will to see that the federation is achieved, come 2015. However, it yet again brought out the underlying challenges that the community is facing, further justifying the call from observers that the step toward forming one state should be greeted with “caution optimism.”

The optimism seems warranted because the EAC leaders have shown a consensus that trade and private sector investments are crucial inputs to sustained growth and development. But some caution regarding what to expect from the EAC is hardly surprising, as the collapse in 1977 of an earlier effort at regional integration, suggests that the road ahead is not straight forward, with numerous barriers left that must be overcome.

The EAC observers argue that factors that led to the collapse of the bloc in the 1970s are playing out differently at the moment and efforts to form a federation are being carried out under very different set of political and economic circumstances.

Catching up
They point out that the fast growth of Uganda and Tanzania in comparison to Kenya over the past 20 years, has not only narrowed the gap between them and their larger neighbour, but it has given these nations confidence in their competitive abilities.

On the political front, all three countries are much closer politically than they were 30 years ago. Changes in the economic structures of these countries and a growing middle class that has increasingly sophisticated product demands, suggest that the benefits from trade may be greater than earlier times when the commodity structures of all these countries were mainly agricultural.

“These three reasons may give us confidence that “This time is different when it comes to the gains that each country can capture from deeper regional integration,” Prof. Ethan Kapsteine, in a paper on the future of the integration, said.

While the observers say the integration this time is different, research shows that the citizens are skeptical and doubt that the changes are significant enough to give greater confidence that the East African integration will promote trade, investment and job creation in the years ahead.

Reports from experts hired to look into integration issues and the recommendations from the council of ministers that provide a road map for the way forward, have been largely adopted by political leaders.

The reports, however, show that citizens have a feeling that democratic deficits and lack of accountability that exists in some countries may be replicated at the regional level.
The fears and concerns registered by the populace were categorised into political, economic, legal and socio- cultural, among others.

From a political perspective, the East Africans are scared of losing their sovereignty. And since the 2015 political federation means creating one single state, it means partner states should prepare to cede some political powers.

On legal grounds, the people insist that there are many disparities in governance, probably the reason why Tanzania, the largest of all the states is taking a slow motion in signing most policies as developed by the states.

“I believe these are very pertinent issues and we should take them very seriously. When Burundi and Rwanda joined the community, there was a special programme for bringing them on board,” Ms Dora Byamukama, a Ugandan representative in East African Legislative Assembly, says.

Land wrangles
There is a fear that with the limited land in some states, some people may lose the little space they have. The fear to lose land therefore continues to be a sensitive issue and as the experts reported, “a potential source of conflict” when the countries finally federate.

Source: Daily Monitor

http://www.monitor.co.ug/SpecialReports/-/688342/688342/-/eduqir/-/index.html

No borders: Hiring the disabled can still get you result

Disabled Children of Katalemwa Cheshire Home entertain guests during the launch of their 40th anniversary in Kampala. Many have been rejected at work places

but they have potential. The common adage goes disability is not inability. Some companies are now recruiting them and the results are worthwhile proving that they can do what a normal person can or even better.

Like any other Ugandans, the skills, experience and educational qualifications of the deaf and dumb are widely varied, but they tend to be an under-utilised talent pool.

If companies look beyond someone’s disability and seize the potential of everyone who wants to work for them, they could benefit immensely.

A recent report from the International Labour Organisation: Disabled persons and employment, indicates that disabled persons comprise of more than 600 million of the seven billion people that make the global population.

“While many disabled persons are successfully employed and fully included in society, as a group, they face disproportionate poverty and severe unemployment,” the report reads in part.

“A lack of global data about their numbers and situation is only one piece of evidence supporting the discrimination and exclusion they often face. National data, when it exists, verifies the fact that people with disabilities, and especially women, are less likely to access education, training and employment of any kind.”
Some companies in Uganda are adopting employment of disabled persons in their policies.

“We strongly adhere to our human resource policy that does not discriminate against job seekers and employees on any grounds. We believe that including people with physical impairment in our workforce increases our pool of talent and skill,” Ms Brenda Kyasiimire, the human resource manager at Rwenzori Bottling Company Limited, says.

Recognised
Ms Barbra Gwosusa and MsFlorence Aguti have not had a fair share of life because both are deaf and dumb.
It is with their current job placements at Rwenzori Bottling that they are starting to realise their worth.

Ms Aguti studied in Arua District but later moved to Jinja District where she studied a tailoring course.

Tailoring was not earning her enough money to buy “beautiful shoes and jewelry” as the 29-year-old says through an interpreter Isaac Lukyamuzi. She later joined the teaching profession at Gayaza School for the Deaf tutoring primary one and two in sign language.

However, she did not give up on the job search. She applied for a vacancy at the company last September and luckily there was a vacancy that she is currently filling.

“My life is better now because of the good working conditions and relations I have with other employees. Everyone loves and cares for us,” Ms Aguti says. “I am more confident now and have realised that I can do anything that a normal person can do or even better.”

For the future, Ms Aguti dreams of meeting a good man who will love her for who she is.

Bitter side
Her colleague Ms Gwosusa has tasted the bitter side of being employed with a disability.

She studied in Ntinda School for the Deaf. However, she did not go beyond Senior Four because of school fees constraints. She was previously working as a caterer in a hotel in Wandegeya but could not stomach the oppression she was facing from some of her workmates and the Shs60,000 per month was so meagre.

“I was reduced to rubbish in that place. No one believed in me not even the managers,” she said, engrossed in deep thought.

Source: Daily Monitor

http://www.monitor.co.ug/Magazines

EU Signs ACTA, But Treaty Remains in Doubt

JANUARY 26, 2012 BY SEAN FLYNN
The European Union Signed ACTA today – months after withholding its signature at the official signing ceremony in Japan. But the political atmosphere in the EU remains very much in flux. The key to the future is that, unlike the US, the EU has admitted that ACTA is a binding international agreement and therefore requires parliamentary approval. But Parliamentary approval in the EU is in doubt.

Marietje Schaake, a pro-business member of the Alliance of Liberals and Democrats for Europe in the European Parliament, known for being “Europe’s most wired politician,” recounted this week that “the European Parliament has the decisive voice on ACTA,” with the first public “exchange of views” on ACTA in the key committee scheduled for February 29th or March 1st. The committee will most likely hold its vote on the ratification of the treaty in April or May, with a full parliament vote expected in June.

The EU vote is likely to be close, especially in the wake of the short term defeat of SOPA and the heightened awareness of internet freedom in its wake. As Schaake notes:
“In November 2010 we proposed an alternative resolution on ACTA, which intended to take away the main concerns. It was voted down by a very slight majority, . . . 16 votes, out of 736.”
So Schaake and others are calling for a grass roots campaign to swing the handful of votes needed to defeat ACTA in the EU.

Meanwhile, the U.S. is still holding firm to its position that the executive branch can bind Congress to ACTA without the traditional congressional approval required of treaties or internationally binding Executive Agreements. Senator Wyden challenged the administration on this plan, most recently to the State Department’s top legal advisor, but as of yet the administration has not backed down or provided legal reasoning justifying the constitutionality of its course of action. A Constitutional showdown with Congress may be looming.

No other country has ratified ACTA. The Mexico Senate has voted once to reject it, albeit in a non-binding resolution. In the post-SOPA landscape, it looks more unlikely that it will go into effect than it did a few months ago. But the ultimate tally will be sure to be close.

Source: http://infojustice.org/archives/7508

Kenya court set to deliver ruling on anti-counterfeit law

Gichinga Ndirangu, HAI Africa

25 January 2012

After almost three years of waiting since three petitioners living with HIV filed a constitutional petition challenging the implementation of a law on anti-counterfeiting, the Kenyan High court is due to deliver a verdict on March 9.

The court will rule on whether the Kenya Anti-Counterfeit Act of 2008 which was enacted by the national parliament infringes on the right to access more affordable medicines especially for treatment of HIV and other public health challenges. Depending on the decision, it is widely expected that this case, the first legal challenge in Africa against a new push for anti-counterfeit legislation, could have significant implications on other countries preparing similar laws.

On April 23, 2010 Kenyan High Court Judge Roseline Wendoh issued a conservatory order stopping the government from implementing the Anti-Counterfeit Act with respect to medicines until the case heard and determined.

The three petitioners in the case have argued that the Kenyan law should be declared unconstitutional on the grounds that it infringes on their right to health by giving a broad definition and interpretation on what constitutes counterfeit medicines in a manner that affects access to more affordable generic medicines.

On January 24, 2012 the lawyers representing the petitioners and interested parties made oral submissions to the trial judge to which the Attorney-General, as legal representative of the government, was invited to respond.

The petitioners argued that the government was obliged to secure the right to treatment of all persons living with HIV which required unfettered access to medicines. The Kenyan law contained ambiguities, which if misinterpreted or abused would be detrimental to the government’s ongoing efforts to ensure access to essential medicines for all Kenyans.
The court was invited to address these ambiguities to safeguard any discrimination against more affordable generic medicines. It was argued that the definition of ‘counterfeiting’ could easily be misinterpreted, with a devastating impact on generic medicines which form the backbone of Kenya’s public health programmes.

The power of seizure conferred on the police could be abused to affect imports of generic medicines because there were no clear guidelines to safeguard the rights of importers and patients. This would result in derogation from constitutional rights and freedoms regarding unfettered access to treatment. The court was invited to take cognizance of seizures of generic medicines by customs officials in various transit points like Holland in the recent past.

“This is not an academic petition; the risk is real,” warned Steve Luseno, lead counsel for the three petitioners.

Mr Omwanza, representing the interested parties, warned that the Kenyan law went beyond the country’s obligations under the Agreement on Trade-related Aspects of Intellectual Property Rights (TRIPS) by seeking extra-territorial enforcement of Intellectual Property Rights not recognised under Kenyan law.

The UN Special Rapporteur on Health and Human Rights, Anand Grover, invited the court to consider that access to medicines is key to the progressive realisation of the right to health and that the Kenyan law undermined this right.

In his response, the Attorney-General contested that the Act limited or threatened access to generic medicines. The AG argued that generic medicines were distinct from counterfeit medicines and argued the need to check on counterfeits because of the risk to health. It was argued that the Kenyan Act was necessary to regulate counterfeit medicines.

The High Court is set to make a ruling on March 9. If declared unconstitutional, the Kenyan parliament will be expected to review the Act to safeguard the right to access treatment and address the ambiguity over counterfeit and generic medicines.

Gichinga Ndirangu is Regional Coordinator, HAI Africa